Monday, October 5, 2009

My Believing Vs. Science

You can call me a person with low intelligent for not to believing that I am relative to Ape or Chimpanzee or coming from these animal. Here I will say.... Hell no! I am "Human" and they are "Animal"!

I like medical science. As I said and will say it a gain..., If I am seriously sick I will find the good doctors but will never ever forget to ask permition from my God. Means, pray!! Actually for me is pray first and then to the doctor.

Some scientists believe in that we are coming from Ape. Too sad, still living in the dark hole still talking but can't prove it yet. My one question to me is.. Even if we are coming from ape or chimpanzee, why we human are so took off but.....the ape and the chimp are still the same hole.....stupid?? Lets see these simple facts of my thinking and lets forget about science for a minute........

1. We human are living in a nice house and nice car but the Ape are still living in the jungle and still moving very slowly with their big butts?

2. We human are talking in language, some are capable to speak more than one language but why the ape and the chimp are still talking like..."Woo Woo, Waa Waa, pew pew and par par??" Sadly the only language that I will never speak is, that chimp's language. Do not argue me with that a few sign language that chimp has which is within limited.

3. While human are eating grill, BBQ, curry and drinking Champing, sparkling water but the ape and the chimp are eating fruit and vegetable (I am not talking about dietitian here so dare to argue with me), on top of that they drink what ever they can reach!!

4. Majority speaking, we human can't live with ape or chimp! (I mean neighbour themself and next door to you as a nother family)!! You never know when they will do it what to you.

5.We normal human have sex with another human being, not with animal. Those few, very few human who are having sex with animal are sick in their heads. By the way would you like to be a friend with who is openly having sex with animal?? I might not hate this man but will not be friend with this person.

6. Why we have little hair and the ape and chimp has lots of fully hair. By the way I like my looks and will be so sad if I am with fully haired. OK do not tell me about those 2 boys in Mexico who are very hairy!! Here is the different....These Mexican brothers have hair but they speak "Spanish" not that "Woo Woo Woo" language!

7. OK the obviously different one is..... we human do not show our private parts all over the towns like ape, chimp or other animal. The dog wear it sometime but still must show their private parts! (OK do not bringing in the nude sun bathing. This will be another topic to argue??"

8. If you still do not see why we human are not like ape and chimp. Last thing I have to say..... we human do not @#$%ing every where. We do have toilet bowls some even with gold plated seat...10 or 18 carets gold seat!!! Sadly the ape and chimp are doing everywhere as they wanted to. More over animal loves to sniff their waste but not me!!

9. Lets see ZOO!!! we put animals in the cave right?? Turn this table reverse side and just think it... lets put the children, men and women different caves. We human remember to feed the damn ape and chimp but these two animal will never feed you beside that they will beat you up!!

Tell me Crazy but I do not care. I believe in..
"By the word of the Lord the heavens were made, and all their host by the breath of his mouth."
Psalm 33:6

By the way those who believe in that " we are coming from ape and chimp," I love you all, I just disagreeing with your way of thinking. One last question, How many colored ape and chimp?? Black, white, yellow, red and brown like human??? Share me why???

See the following that I read from " A Creation Perspective"....

"This does complicate the fossil picture, however. The similarities of the skeletons, combined with the various races of man and the various species of apes, can make the evolutionary task of determining ancestry very confusing. Add to this the fact that one does not always have a complete skeleton, but only a few bones, or fragments of bones. Furthermore, what makes humans unique is not the structure of our skeleton but intangibles such as language, culture, and thought, which are very difficult to infer from the fossil record. Even if these differences arise from one or two percent of the genome, this is a very significant one or two percent.

A subject of frequent discussion among creationists and evolutionists is the remarkable genetic similarity between humans and apes, somewhere in the neighborhood of 98 to 99 percent. This curious situation leads to some questions. Why is it so difficult for evolutionists to determine the human-ape connection from fossils, if we have a common ancestry, and why would God create something so similar to man, if we don't?

In the first place, many mammals have a high degree of genetic similarity (Spetner, Not by Chance, page 69). For example, the cytochrome C of a dog is about 90 percent similar to that of a human, and the hemoglobin of a horse is about 88 percent similar to that of a human. In view of this, a 98 percent genetic similarity between apes and humans is not surprising. It is interesting that some sources put the difference between humans and apes much higher, as high as 10 percent. At least for one gene, human and chimpanzee alleles seem to differ by 13 base pairs out of 270, for a difference of about 5 percent. (See Science, 6 Jan. 1995, pp. 35-36.)

There are also some notable differences, apparently. Mammals in general can drink and breathe at the same time, according to a posting on talk.origins. But humans cannot. This is the price we pay for being able to speak. It would seem that this must involve quite a bit of genetic difference from the apes.

And in fact, there appears to be a notable division between the skeletons of apes and humans. Glenn C. Conroy of Washington University in St. Louis reported in the journal Science in June, 1998 that "Mr. Ples," the name given for the fossil of an Australopithecus africanus, a hominid that lived in what is now South Africa, had the brain capacity of about 515 cubic centimeters. Another A. africanus skull had a brain capacity of 370 cc. Modern humans have a brain size of about 1,350 cc., while 370 cc is the size of a chimpanzee brain.

In real life, there is no problem distinguishing between humans and apes. I have never seen a gorilla that I would confuse with a human, or vice versa, despite the unusual appearances of various rare individuals. I never heard of a gorilla or a chimpanzee escaping from the zoo and disguising itself as a human for several months before it was found out and returned to captivity. Even if an ape should evolve to a human stature with an ape brain, it would be far from a human being. If we saw the creatures from which fossils arose in real life, we might have very little difficulty knowing whether they were humans or apes, but the scarcity of evidence leaves plenty of room for interpretation.

One can understand in evolutionary terms why there should be animals such as apes that are so close to humans. But why would God create a creature that is so close to a human, but not quite? To answer this, we have to reason from what we know or can infer about God's motives in the creation. This may lead us to considerations that seem far removed from those that are expected in this context. The original creation was intended to contribute to the happiness of man and animal. We can assume that in many cases the Lord created animals that would be a delight to man, and created man to be a blessing to the animals. Even today, both children and adults enjoy seeing gorillas and chimpanzees in zoos. It is reasonable to assume that these creatures were partly made for just this reason, to be a joy and entertainment to us. In a similar way, we can speculate in unorthodox terms that an animal such as the koala bear was created because of its cuddly appearance, which is a delight to children and many adults. Even if such creatures don't seem well adapted from our viewpoint, they serve their purposes very well."

No comments: